Tuesday, 1 October 2019

Draft #1 Summary_Reader Response: Cross Island




In the article “Nature Group seeks more information on the impact of Cross Island Line Site Investigations” Neo (2018) stated that nature lovers are encouraging the public to voice out their concerns towards the Land Transport Authority (LTA) regarding the drilling works for the future Cross Island MRT line. The public is anticipating whether LTA would release the whole process of monitoring programs as “endangered” animals were spotted after site investigation was completed. They also doubt that LTA did a great job in the environmental impact assessment as the result was “mainly moderate” and was unwilling to provide comment nor evidence when asked. Nature lovers urge LTA to “provide assurance” and re-emphasize that monitoring program should continue even if the site investigation ends. They also highlighted that the monitoring methods and data are the keys to clear the doubts within the public as the information available was insufficient. Actions taken by the nature reserve group are understandable to a certain extent however, LTA did consider the nature reserve and is trying to provide the finest plan that benefits both the environment and public. 

A major factor that LTA has been taking into consideration is the public in terms of both the commuters and the residents that stay around the future construction area. In the article “Running under nature reserve, the better option” Hoi (2019) stated that an additional of $2 billion in miscellaneous costs such as acquiring properties, engineering problems, and longer commute duration as compared to the direct alignment. In response to this statement, the government is paying more for a longer route which will directly affect the commuters as travel fare will increase as well. Also, residents around the construction area might face noise pollution and forced to shift house if skirting alignment is accepted. This will create many inconveniences for elderly residents around the area.

Another factor that plays a huge role in LTA’s decision is nature reserves. LTA did emphasize that they would continue with their efforts to minimize the environmental impacts that come along with the construction in the future. Moreover, Hoi (2019) also stated that impacts are only momentary and “nature will replenish the ecological footprints”. Phase 2 of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) which assesses the potential environmental impact of the construction and operations, as well as the mitigation measures, declare that all the constructions on land are located out of the Central Catchment Nature Reserve (CCNR). The report also stated that in terms of habitat, installations of fabricated crossing aid such as poles and rope bridges are designed to lend a hand for the endangered animals. At the same time, Anthony O’ Dempsey, an LTA independent reviewer of the phase 2 EIA stated that “From an ecology and biodiversity point of view, the two alignment options are comparable in terms of habitat loss. Both options result in the loss of nominally 3 hectares of regrowth forest.”

Even though LTA is currently in a tough position as they must appeal to both the commuters and the nature reserve group request, they are still welcoming the public to raise their concern towards this project. This has proven that the LTA is trying their best to please all parties and come out with the finest solution.

Word Count: 540

References 

Land Transport Authority. (2019, September 2). Cross Island Line. Retrieved from https://www.lta.gov.sg/content/ltaweb/en/public-transport/projects/cross-island-line.html
Hoi, P. C. P. (2019, September 6). Running under nature reserve the better option. The Straits Time. Retrieved from https://www.straitstimes.com/forum/letters-in-print/running-under-nature-reserve-the-better-option
Neo, C. C. (2018, June 28). Nature group seeks more information on impact of Cross Island Line site investigations. Todayonline. Retrieved from https://www.todayonline.com/singapore/nature-group-seeks-more-information-impact-cross-island-line-site-investigations
Toh, T. W. (2019, September 3). Cross Island Line: Running under nature reserve or skirting it both feasible, says LTA. The Straits Time. Retrieved from https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/transport/cross-island-line-running-under-nature-reserve-or-skirting-it-both-feasible-says


No comments:

Post a Comment

Reflection on SIE 2016

Showcase Initially, I was reluctant to enter the showcase, but with the support of my peer, I was able to step out of my comfort zone. I...